Comparing Student-Created to Teacher-Created Study Guides Within An Interteaching Framework

Author:

Contreras Bethany P.1,Dovgan Kristen2,Johnson Katherine3,Kahng SungWoo4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

3. Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

4. Department of Applied Psychology, Rutgers University, Brunswick, NJ, USA

Abstract

Background: The role of the preparation or study guide in interteaching is relatively unexplored. One study demonstrated that having students create their own study guide was just as effective as completing a teacher-created study guide. Objective: The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend the methods of previous research to compare the effects of student-created to teacher-created study guides on student learning. Method: We compared the effects of teacher-created to student-created study guides on student quiz scores within the context of an interteaching framework using multi-element designs. We counterbalanced the order of study guide implementation for a total of 24 quizzes across two classes of 25 students each. Results: Quiz scores were high overall, and the most effective study guide type varied across class sections; student-created was more effective for Class 1 and teacher-created was more effective for Class 2. Conclusion: Interteaching resulted in high quiz scores (above 80%) overall, regardless of study guide type. There may be an interaction between discussion length, instructor, and study guide type that warrants further investigation. Teaching Implications: The results of this study suggest that instructors using the interteaching format can save time in preparing for their class by having the students create their own study guides while still promoting quality learning.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Education

Reference1 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3