Improving Information Literacy in Introductory Psychology Through Short, Adaptive Interventions

Author:

Cross Holly1ORCID,Downey Alison2ORCID,Thompson Abbie1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN, USA

2. Christopher Center Library, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN, USA

Abstract

Background The American Psychological Association has identified information literacy as a crucial component to undergraduate education. One major barrier to comprehensive information literacy instruction has been a lack of guidance integrating this into survey courses, particularly with reduced pedagogical resources available. Objective This research evaluates the effectiveness of a scaffolded information literacy curriculum that may be integrated into psychology courses. Method Students in introductory psychology courses were taught with either an information literacy curriculum or the typical science-focused curriculum. Information literacy knowledge was evaluated using a multiple-choice test. Results Students who received the specialized curriculum demonstrated significant improvements on an objective information literacy test by the end of the course, while students in the control group did not. Conclusion Evidence suggests that this easily adaptable information literacy curriculum is effective in meeting psychology information literacy goals, more so than the traditional science-focused curriculum taught in introductory psychology classes. Teaching Implications Instructors and faculty should be encouraged to utilize this adaptive curriculum, available on Open Science Framework, as a way of improving information literacy. Other implications, including feasibility and content, are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology,Education

Reference15 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (2023). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 3.0. https://apps.apa.org/CommentCentral2/attachments/Site97-Undergrad%20Guidelin es.pdf

2. Association of College & Research Libraries. (2010). Psychology information literacy standards. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/psych_info_lit.pdf

3. Association of College & Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/files/issues/infolit/framework.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3