Comparison of Open Drainage Versus Closed Catheter Irrigation for Treatment of Suppurative Flexor Tenosynovitis

Author:

Born Trevor R.1,Wagner Eric R.1,Kakar Sanjeev1

Affiliation:

1. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes associated with different surgical treatments in the management of suppurative flexor tenosynovitis (SFT). Methods: Patients treated by open drainage (OD) through a single incision and closed catheter irrigation (CCI) of the tendon sheath were evaluated from 2003 to 2009 at a single institution. Variables examined included culture results, time to surgery, duration of hospitalization and antibiotic therapy, pain, reoperation, and functional outcomes were recorded. Statistical analyses used included parametric and nonparametric t tests. Results: Twenty-four patients were treated for SFT with a mean follow-up of 3 ± 2 years. There were 13 (100%) males in the OD group compared to 8 (72%) males within the CCI group. Ninety-two percent of patients who underwent OD and 100% who underwent CCI reported none or mild pain. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to functional outcome scores. Factors leading to worse functional outcomes included prolonged time to receiving antibiotics and Staphylococcus aureus infection. Smokers required prolonged antibiotic treatment compared to nonsmokers. Accounting for planned returns to the operating room, there was no difference in reoperation rates between the OD or CCI groups. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of SFT with either OD or CCI resulted in similar outcomes for pain, function, and need for reoperation. Factors that lead to poor outcomes include S aureus culture, prolonged time to antibiotics, and smoking.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3