Extremity Pressure in Splints Wrapped With an Elastic Bandage Versus Bias Cut Stockinette: An Experimental Model

Author:

Schoenfeldt Theodore L.1ORCID,Bowman Christine A.1,MacConnell Ashley E.1,Fishman Felicity G.1

Affiliation:

1. Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA

Abstract

Background: Many variables affect the pressure caused by splinting or casting. The purpose of this study was to compare pressure underlying a splint wrapped with either an elastic bandage or a bias cut stockinette. Methods: Thirty-two plaster volar resting splints were applied to a simulated extremity with a saline bag secured to it. A pressure transducer was connected to the saline bag to monitor changes in pressure once splints were applied, and 15 mL increments of saline were added to the bag to simulate swelling. Each dressing type was tested with normal application and tight application. Results: Normal application splints wrapped with either bias cut stockinette or an elastic bandage demonstrated similar initial splint pressures ( P = .81). With simulated swelling, splints wrapped with bias cut stockinette demonstrated a 15 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-28.5) higher average pressure than those wrapped with an elastic bandage ( P = .035). Tight application splints with an elastic bandage wrap demonstrated a 46 mmHg (95% CI, 16-77) higher initial splint pressure than those wrapped with bias cut stockinette ( P = .009). Conclusions: Splints wrapped using either an elastic bandage or bias cut stockinette appear to have a similar safety profile, although in cases of excessive swelling, an elastic bandage may provide additional compliance. Tight splint application appears to be more hazardous with the use of an elastic bandage compared with a bias cut stockinette. Further study of the use of elastic bandages and bias cut stockinettes in the clinical setting may be warranted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3