Abstract
Vengefulness is a discredited entity. It is considered primitive and uncivilized despite the fact that it is prevalent in our personal and social lives. This article suggests that vengefulness is part of one’s regular, emotional repertoire. It serves to protect from unbearable emotional pain when being made irrelevant, dismissed and ostracized. It safeguards the hope to become re-included in a lawful, just community. Vengefulness comprises a coded communication about ruptures that have not been properly exposed and acknowledged. As such, they may turn into viscous cycles of vengeful attacks and counter attacks. It is argued that unacknowledged injuries to human dignity engender a relational vocabulary of its own; it may block connectedness and restrict possibilities for reconciliation and mutual concern. The group conductor’s ability to understand this vocabulary for what it is, namely, a legitimate quest for restoring justice and accountability can be valuable in the process of recovery from traumatic experiences.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference22 articles.
1. Amery J. (1980) At the mind’s limits: contemplations by a survivor on Auschwitz and its realities. Indiana. Indiana University press.
2. Bearing Witness: Group Analysis as Witness Training in Action
3. Revenge
4. An outline of intersubjectivity: The development of recognition.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献