Affiliation:
1. Al-Minia Faculty of Medicine, Egypt,
2. Cairo Faculty of Medicine, Egypt,
Abstract
The main author of this article had the opportunity to witness, to observe and to be trained in two different styles of group therapy leadership over the past few years: A more directive, prescriptive and active style that was developed in Egypt and is considered as the traditional Egyptian style of conducting dynamic therapy groups (Egyptian Integrative Dynamic Model) and a less directive, more descriptive and passive style that was developed in the UK and is considered as the traditional style of leading dynamic therapy groups within the British National Health Service (British Group Analysis). The article tries to investigate the socio-cultural factors that favoured adopting the more directive, prescriptive and active format in the Egyptian model although it revolves around the same object–relations theoretical core as the British one. This might stimulate an interesting discussion on the relativity of psychotherapy concepts, processes and aims among different cultures.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference31 articles.
1. Barron, F.
(1988) `Putting Creativity to Work', in
R.J. Sternberg
(ed.) The Nature of Creativity , pp. 76-98.
England:
Cambridge University Press
.
2. Chu, J.
and
Sue, S.
(1984) `Asian/Pacific-Americans and Group Practice', in
L.E. Davis
(ed.) Ethnicity in Social Group Work Practice, pp.
23-35. New York:
Haworth Press.
3. Corey, G.
(2004) `Introduction to Group Work', in
G. Corey
(ed.) Theory and Practice of Group Counselling (6th
edition), pp. 3-24. Monterey,
CA: Rooks/
Cole-Thomson
.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献