Affiliation:
1. Program on Scientific Freedom, Responsibility and Law, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA
Abstract
Any profession that is considering the development of ethical standards should give serious attention to the intended purposes of such standards, what form they should take, what functions they will serve, how the process for developing them should be organized, what outcomes are sought, and what values are central to the mission and performance of the profession. The profession serves as a normative reference group for individual practitioners and through ethical standards clarifies, for both its members and outsiders, the norms that ought to govern professional behavior. Such standards may be aspirational, educational, or regulatory, and may perform many functions, nine of which are discussed. The process of developing standards is assessed because of the role it plays in gaining consensus on professional values and ethical norms. Finally, several outcomes likely to increase the value and utility of ethical standards are identified. Key words: ethical standards, accountability, professional association.
Reference6 articles.
1. Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact?
2. Frankel MS (1993). Professional societies and responsible research conduct. In: Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Vol. II. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 26-49.
3. Tuohy CJ, Wolfson AD (1977). The political economy of professionalism: A perspective . In: Four aspects of professionalism. Ottawa, Canada: Consumer Research Council, p. 67.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献