Nonpublication and Selective Outcome Reporting of Oral Health Trials

Author:

Diakonoff H.12ORCID,Khalil G.3,Jungo S.14,Treluyer J.M.356,Fron-Chabouis H.789,Smaïl-Faugeron V.134

Affiliation:

1. Université Paris Cité, Faculté de santé, UFR d’odontologie, Paris, France

2. Institut droit et santé, INSERM UMR_S 1145, Université de Paris, Paris, France

3. EA7323 Pediatric and Perinatal Drug Evaluation and Pharmacology, Université de Paris, Paris, France

4. Dental Medicine Department, AP-HP, Bretonneau Hospital, Paris, France

5. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France

6. Clinical Research Unit Paris Descartes–CIC P1419, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France

7. Faculté d’odontologie, Université de Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France

8. Laboratoire ICMCB, UMR5026 (CNRS), Pessac, France

9. Service de médecine et chirurgie bucco-dentaire, hôpital Saint André, CHU, Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Less than one-quarter of oral health trials are registered in a public registry. However, no study has assessed the extent of study publication and selective outcome reporting bias in the field of oral health. We identified oral health trials registered between 2006 and 2016 in ClinicalTrials.gov. We assessed whether results of early discontinued trials, trials having an unknown status, and completed trials had been published and, among published trials, whether outcomes differed between the registered record and the corresponding publication. We included 1,399 trials, of which 81 (5.8%) were discontinued, 247 (17.7%) had an unknown status, and 1,071 (76.6%) were completed. The registration was prospective for 719 (51.9%) trials. Over half the registered trials were unpublished ( n = 793, 56.7%). To explore the association between trials publication and characteristics of trials, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Trials conducted in the United States ( P = 0.003) or Brazil ( P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of publication, whereas trials registered prospectively ( P = 0.001) and industry-sponsored trials ( P = 0.02) were associated with decreased odds. Among the 479 published trials with completed status, the primary outcomes of 215 (44.9%) articles differed from that registered. Major discrepancies consisted of the introduction of a new primary outcome in the published article (196 [91.2%]) and the transformation of a registered secondary outcome into a primary outcome (112 [52.1%]). In the remaining 264 (55.1%) trials, primary outcomes did not differ from that registered, but 141 (53.4%) had been registered retrospectively. Our study highlights the high rate of nonpublication and selective outcome reporting in the field of oral health. These results could alert sponsors, funders, authors of systematic reviews, and the oral health research community at large to combat the nondisclosure of trial results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3