Within-subject Coronal Caries Distribution Patterns: An Evaluation of Randomness with Respect to the Midline

Author:

Hujoel P.P.1,Lamont R.J.2,DeRouen T.A.3,Davis S.4,Leroux B.G.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry SM-35, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

2. Department of Oral Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

3. Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, School of Dentistry SM-35, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

4. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104

Abstract

The distribution of caries among homologous surfaces can exhibit three possible patterns: random, aggregated, or regular. In a random caries pattern, caries lesions are randomly distributed among homologous surfaces. An aggregated caries pattern is distinguished by the aggregation of lesions on one side of the mouth or the other to a greater extent than would be expected by chance alone. For a regular caries pattern, the left-right distribution of lesions is more homogenous than would be expected by chance alone. A test statistic based on the left-right distribution of caries lesions among discordant homologous pairs was developed to investigate which of these three caries patterns is present in a representative sample of the adult United States population. The data originated from the National Survey of Oral Health in the US (Employed Adults), 1985-1986. Of the 15,132 subjects studied, 12,776 subjects had 2 or more decayed or filled teeth. (At least 2 carious or filled teeth are required for detection of patterns.) Approximately 50% of these subjects (n = 6,439) had two or more discordant homologous tooth pairs. With these tooth pairs, the hypothesis of a random caries pattern was rejected in favor of an aggregated caries pattern (p < 0.0001). Similar findings were obtained with discordant homologous surface pairs. This aggregation of caries on one side of the mouth or the other may be due to genetic, infectious, and/or environmental factors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference27 articles.

1. Ahlgren J. (1976). Masticatory movements in man. In: Mastication. Anderson D, Methews B, editors. Bristol: John Wright and Sons, p 119.

2. Backer-Dirks O. (1965). The distribution of caries resistance in relation to tooth surfaces. In: Caries-resistant teeth. Wolstenholme GEW, O'Connor M, editors. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, pp 66-85.

3. Incidence of Caries at Different Locations on the Teeth

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3