Abstract
In this article, the authors explain the federal requirements for identifying the population of learners who may participate in the alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards. The authors present four approaches to providing the necessary documentation, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each. The authors then focus entirely on curriculum-based measurement (CBM) as the most promising approach for providing such documentation. The hope is that a CBM decision-making process not only provides a clear and objective means for identifying the population to participate in the alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards but also enhances the quality of special education programming as well as student outcomes.
Subject
Law,Health(social science)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献