Disaster Preparedness and Response for Persons With Mobility Impairments

Author:

Fox Michael H.1,White Glen W.2,Rooney Catherine2,Rowland Jennifer L.3

Affiliation:

1. University of Kansas Medical Center,

2. University of Kansas

3. University of Illinois at Chicago

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a major disaster on county-level preparedness for persons with mobility disabilities. The authors surveyed 30 randomly selected Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster sites between 1998 and 2003 to determine disability surveillance capacity, the extent to which the disaster experience influenced changes in policies and practices, whether persons with disabilities were involved in the planning process, what factors appeared to drive the planning process, and whether current policies and procedures could be “best practices.” They found that people with disabilities were poorly represented in emergency planning; federal training on the needs of people with disabilities appeared useful, although only 27% of emergency managers reported completing the training; 20% of emergency managers reported having disability guidelines in place; and county-level surveillance systems were ineffective. Sixty-six percent of counties had no intention of modifying their guidelines to accommodate the needs of persons with mobility impairments, citing limitations from (a) costs, (b) limited staffing, (c) lack of awareness, (d) other security demands, and (e) broader responsiveness to all “special needs individuals.” The authors suggest that improved training, awareness, and surveillance are needed so communities can better respond to the needs of persons with disabilities before, during, and after local disasters. Possible techniques include developing improved technology assistance, providing environmental modifications to improve access for persons with disabilities during disasters, and ensuring far greater participation of persons with disabilities in all phases of the disaster planning and response process.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Health (social science)

Reference19 articles.

Cited by 62 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3