Connecting Contemporary Paradigms to the Social Security Administration’s Disability Evaluation Process

Author:

Brandt Diane E.1,Houtenville Andrew J.2,Huynh Minh T.3,Chan Leighton3,Rasch Elizabeth K.3

Affiliation:

1. National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD, USA,

2. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA

3. National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD, USA

Abstract

From 1998 to 2008, the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) disability insurance program (DI) applications rose from 1.2 million to 2.3 million and exceeded 3 million in 2009. Given these large and growing numbers, even small changes in processing disability applications may reduce processing time, lower program costs, and improve performance of SSA’s disability programs. A literature review examining current conceptual models of disability and SSA’s disability evaluation process for adults was conducted. A gap exists between contemporary models of disability and how SSA defines and operationalizes disability. This is complicated by substantial variation in the timing, quantity, and quality of applicant functional information and workplace demands. A focus on impairment marginalizes more comprehensive assessment of function necessary to assess capacity for work. Novel assessment methodologies, such as computer adaptive testing to measure human functioning may hold promise for SSA’s data collection methods and disability assessment.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Health (social science)

Reference68 articles.

1. The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability

2. Altman, B.M. ( 2001). Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In G. L. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 97-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

3. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security

4. Brandt, E.N., Jr. & Pope, A.M. ( 1997). Models of disability and rehabilitation. In Institute of Medicine (Ed.), Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering (pp. 62-80). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3