Affiliation:
1. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
2. Davis Brack Professor of Behavioral Science, Stanford University.
Abstract
Consumer choice is often influenced by the context, defined by the set of alternatives under consideration. Two hypotheses about the effect of context on choice are proposed. The first hypothesis, tradeoff contrast, states that the tendency to prefer an alternative is enhanced or hindered depending on whether the tradeoffs within the set under consideration are favorable or unfavorable to that option. The second hypothesis, extremeness aversion, states that the attractiveness of an option is enhanced if it is an intermediate option in the choice set and is diminished if it is an extreme option. These hypotheses can explain previous findings (e.g., attraction and compromise effects) and predict some new effects, demonstrated in a series of studies with consumer products as choice alternatives. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Subject
Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference20 articles.
1. FarquharPeter H., and PratkanisAnthony R. (1987), “Phantom Choices: The Effects of Unavailable Alternatives on Decision Making,” Technical Report No. 87-2, Center for Decision Technology and Strategy Research, Carnegie Mellon University, 15213.
2. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice
3. Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis
Cited by
498 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献