Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina, Charlotte
2. Binghamton University, State University of New York
3. University of Houston
4. The George Washington University
5. Center for Creative Leadership
6. University of Georgia
7. Rice University
8. Villanova University
9. George Mason University
10. University of Tennessee
Abstract
Gender equity and inclusion has taken center stage in business, science, and policy making. We reflect on three systemic challenges that might hinder the rise of qualified women scholars to leadership positions in business schools: (a) The masculine social structure of business schools, (b) a muddled approach to performance evaluation, and (c) an under-representation of research topics that affect women in the workplace. Drawing on the extant science in gender bias and gender equity, combined with the collective expertise and experience of the author team, we offer 12 actionable solutions for gender-inclusive leadership in business schools. We believe that addressing these challenges could benefit all members, not just women, because it could signal more equitable pathways to multiple business school stakeholders and intended beneficiaries, such as students, donors, practitioners, and policy makers.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Finance
Reference17 articles.
1. AACSB International. (2005–2021). Business school data guide from 2005 through 2021. https://www.aacsb.edu/data/data-reports/data-guide
2. AACSB International. (2021). Business school data guide. https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/data-insights/2021-business-school-data-guide.
3. “An A Is An A”: The New Bottom Line For Valuing Academic Research
4. Gender productivity gap among star performers in STEM and other scientific fields.
5. American Psychological Association. (2023). Equity, diversity, and inclusion in APA journals. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/equity-diversity-inclusion.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献