Affiliation:
1. City University of New York Graduate Center, USA
2. University of Sydney, Australia
Abstract
The nonprofit worker center model has been heralded as a promising development, given union decline and the rise of low-wage service jobs in the United States. Yet rather than challenging exploitative work conditions, some of the national organizations developed by worker centers have embraced neoliberal rationalities through projects such as workforce development, employer alliances, and entrepreneurial ventures. In the same period, strategic funding, which applies the logic and techniques of financial investment to grantmaking, has become standard practice for American foundations. As national worker center grantees adopt neoliberal rationalities through their interactions with funders, we argue that these grantees become less inclined to engage in contentious politics. We analyze the projects of two national worker center organizations, contrasting these groups with three local centers that still organize confrontational campaigns. We suggest that by emphasizing worker leadership, involving members in decision-making, and finding alternative funding sources, they have been able to maintain their confrontational politics.
Funder
the Andrew W. Mellon Seminar on Public Engagement and Collaborative Research at the CUNY Graduate Center
The PSC-CUNY Research Foundation
The CUNY Graduate Center Marilyn J. Gittell Collective
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Building caring cities: From disaster relief to community-based infrastructure for unauthorized and low-paid immigrant workers;Journal of Urban Affairs;2024-06-04
2. Inhalt;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26
3. Frontmatter;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26
4. Über die Autor:innen;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26
5. Literatur;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26