Affiliation:
1. Department of Classics, Miami University, Ohio
Abstract
This paper examines the models classical historians and papyrologists use to study Greek and Egyptian identity during the period of Greek occupation of Egypt (332-30 B.C.E.). Employing the concept of ethnicity, some scholars have recently emphasized the fl uidity with which identity seems to operate in colonial documents from the Ptolemaic period. In particular, scholars argue that these documents attest to the increasing ability of certain “native Egyptians” to act as “Greek” in various administrative and legal contexts. While fi nding this recent use of ethnicity productive in grappling with the complexity of identity as a form of social practice in Ptolemaic Egypt, I nonetheless caution against over-emphasizing the role of context and individual agency within this colonial framework. In contrast, I argue that the concept of race should be added to current models to allow historians of this period to situate certain performances within a larger colonial structure that continued to treat the categories of “Greek” and “Egyptian” as conceptually distinct and indeed representative of inverse positions of social power.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Alcock,Susane. 1994 “Breaking Up the Hellenistic World: Survey and Society .” In I. Morris, ed. Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies , pp. 171-190. Cambridge and New York.
2. Alston,Richard 1997 “ Changing Ethnicities: from the Egyptian to the Roman City.” In T. Cornell and K. Lomas, eds. Gender and Ethnicity in Ancient Italy, pp. 83-96. London.
3. Bagnall, Roger S. 1997 “ Decolonizing Ptolemaic Egypt.” In P. Cartledge, P. Garnsey , and E. Gruen, eds. Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography, pp. 225-241. Berkeley , Los Angeles and London.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献