Affiliation:
1. Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México
2. Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V., Av. Paseo del Norte 5255, Zapopan, Jalisco 45010, México
Abstract
To perform optimal monitoring of the safety profile in the postmarketing phase, Marketing Authorization Holders and National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) must evaluate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that occurred and characterize their nature, frequency, and severity. Management is possible through Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs), which are the reports of organized and processed data. Globally, the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) E2B guideline suggests harmonized activities for the ICSR electronic content and transmission. In America, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) is the agency responsible to implement cooperation among its members, which are recognized as National Regulatory Authorities of Reference (NRARs) such as Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, and the United States. PAHO published the ‘Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas’ suggesting improvement and harmonization in the region. After reviewing the regulatory framework, it is assumed that all NRARs have a regulated ICSR transmission system (i.e. a systematic vigilance system for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating information from ADRs). However, significant differences exist, such as the requirement for social media vigilance, expedited and non-expedited ICSRs, coding, severity, and transmission. The volume of ICSRs has significantly increased, due to using electronic standards managed by the NRAs, which facilitates early identification of new ADRs, allowing the implementation of novel minimization activities, contributing to the continuous assessment of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Nevertheless, there is still area for improvement, especially in Latin America.
Reference73 articles.
1. World Health Organization. The WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring, https://www.who.int/teams/regulation-prequalification/regulation-and-safety/pharmacovigilance/networks/pidm (2022, accessed 22 August 2022).
2. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. About the WHO PIDM, https://who-umc.org/about-the-who-programme-for-international-drug-monitoring/about-the-who-pidm/ (2022, accessed 22 August 2022).
3. An historical overview over Pharmacovigilance
4. Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices
5. Pan American Health Organization. Good pharmacovigilance practices for the Americas. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, https://www.paho.org/en/documents/good-pharmacovigilance-practices-americas-2011 (2011, accessed 22 August 2022).