Suggestibility and Compliance among Alleged False Confessors and Resisters in Criminal Trials

Abstract

This paper describes a study which compares the interrogative suggestibility and compliance scores of 20 alleged false confessors and 20 subjects who had persistently denied their involvement in the crime they were charged with in spite of forensic evidence against them (labelled ‘resisters’). The two groups were ‘matched’ for age, sex, intelligence, memory recall capacity, and the seriousness of the offence. It was hypothesized that the resisters would score significantly lower on tests of suggestibility and compliance than the alleged false confessors. The findings were confirmed at a high level of significance. A separate analysis of 14 resisters and 72 alleged false confessors, where IQ and memory were used as covariates rather than ‘matching’ the two groups on the relevant variables, gave almost identical results. The clinical implications of the findings are discussed.