Exploring the prevalence of personality disorder and the feasibility of using the SAPAS as a screening tool for personality disorder in an emergency department in India

Author:

Sen Piyal12,Barnicot Kirsten34,Podder Priyanka5ORCID,Dasgupta Indraneel67,Gormley Mariko8

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK

2. Elysium Healthcare, UK

3. Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, UK

4. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK

5. Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, India

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Peerless Hospital and B.K. Roy Research Centre, India

7. Royal College of Emergency Medicine, UK

8. King’s College London, UK

Abstract

Background Personality disorders (PD) lead to frequent emergency department (ED) visits. Existing studies have evaluated high-risk ED populations in Western settings. PD screening tools, such as the Standardized Assessment of Personality – Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS), have thus far only been validated in Western populations. Aims This study aimed to establish the screened prevalence of PD, and to evaluate the performance of the SAPAS as a screening tool within an ED setting in India. Methods The study took place in the ED of a private multi-speciality hospital in Kolkata, India. All attendees were approached during two days per week over three months, except those who were medically unfit to participate. The SAPAS and the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) were translated into Bengali and then used as screening tools for PD and as the reference standard for PD diagnosis. Results Out of 120 ED attendees approached, 97 participated (48 men and 49 women), of whom 24% met the criteria for a diagnosis of PD. A cut-off score of 4 on the SAPAS provided the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for detecting PD. Conclusion The prevalence of PD was similar to Western samples, and the SAPAS showed promise for use in a non-Western setting.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3