Affiliation:
1. School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia
2. Forensic Science SA, Australia
Abstract
This study sought to determine how often a medico-legal (coronial) autopsy contributes by identifying the source of infection when there has been a clinical diagnosis of sepsis prior to death. Autopsy reports were retrieved in which it was documented there had been a clinical diagnosis of sepsis preceding death. The autopsy report was reviewed to determine if a source for sepsis had been identified. It was found the autopsy was contributory in this respect in less than one fifth of all cases (35 of 198, 18%). It was also determined if there was a post-autopsy diagnosis of sepsis or if sepsis was excluded by a definite alternative diagnosis. During the study, of the 198 cases, sepsis was excluded by an alternative diagnosis in 78 (39%). Thus, the autopsy may be of more application to confirming or excluding a diagnosis of sepsis than identifying a source for sepsis.
Subject
Law,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sepsis and underlying comorbidities in intensive care unit patients;Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin;2023-06-28
2. A Fatal Case of Rickettsiosis From South Africa;American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology;2021-05-04