Applying Ethics in the Handling of Dual Use Research: The Case of Germany

Author:

Jakob Una1ORCID,Kraemer Felicitas2,Kraus Florian3,Lengauer Thomas4

Affiliation:

1. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF), Germany

2. University of Potsdam, Germany

3. University of Marburg, Germany

4. Max Planck Institute for Informatics and Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, Germany

Abstract

With regard to the handling of dual use research, the dominant approach in Germany aimed at mitigating dual use risks emphasizes the freedom of research and the strengthening of academic self-regulation. This article presents this approach as one example for a framework for handling security-relevant research, underlines the need for awareness-raising about risks of security-relevant research, and, more generally, highlights some of the dilemmas researchers and legislators face when dealing with security-relevant research. The article furthermore presents the key questions developed by the German Joint Committee on the Handling of Security-Relevant Research to provide guidance for researchers and institutions when they address possible research of concern. It applies these key questions in a case study of a well-publicized experiment in which artificial intelligence and drug discovery technologies were used to determine their dual use potential in identifying highly toxic chemical substances. Moreover, it discusses the utility of the framework applied in Germany and concludes that this approach is practicable. Given the strong emphasis on the researchers’ own responsibility, however, awareness of dual use risks and risk mitigation strategies should be further enhanced and an academic culture of responsible handling of security-relevant research should be promoted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference33 articles.

1. Ahuja A (2022) The dark side of using AI to design drugs. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/43102ee8-bee0-4803-bc51-4a313f04d550.

2. Arms Control Association (2024) Chemical and biological weapons status at a glance, Fact Sheets&Briefs, last reviewed January 2024, https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/cbwprolif.

3. No chemical killer AI (yet)

4. Calma J (2022) AI suggested 40,000 new possible chemical weapons. The Verge, 17 March, https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/17/22983197/ai-new-possible-chemical-weapons-generative-models-vx.

5. Campbell Q, Herington J, White A (2023) Censoring chemical data to mitigate dual use risk. arXiv preprint, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.10510.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3