Affiliation:
1. College of Graduate Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Abstract
The heated debate around Section 25 of the South African Constitution and the principle of “expropriation of land without compensation” is conspicuously missing the inextricable link between land, water, and gender questions. Within former settler colonies, the “land question” is a “water question” and, by extension, also a “gender question.” The racially inequitable land distribution, codified in the Native Land Act of 1913, mirrored the unequal distribution of rights and access to water as codified in the Water Act of 1956. This was compounded by the gender question, in which lack of access to land for women mutated into lack of access to other productive resources. While secondary data analysis reveals that blacks control only 5.8% of agricultural water uses, Black women control less than 1%. Such intersectionality of race, class, and gender ought to remain a relentless focus of transformative social policy in South Africa.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecology,Cultural Studies,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference41 articles.
1. Beyond the social protection paradigm: social policy in Africa's development
2. Household food security status in South Africa
3. Bene C., Cook S., Hirsch D., Polak P., Vallée D. & van Koppen B. (2007). Reversing the flow: Agricultural water management pathways for poverty reduction. Water for farming to fight poverty. IWMI Part 3. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.5973&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献