Optimizing Protein Harvest From Nasal Brushings for Determining Local Allergy Responses

Author:

Saricilar Erin C.1,Hamizan Aneeza12,Alvarado Raquel1,Rimmer Janet134,Sewell William56,Tatersall Jessica1,Barham Henry P.7,Harvey Richard18

Affiliation:

1. Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St. Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

3. Upper Airway Research Group, Woolcock Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. Faculty of Medicine, Notre Dame University, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

5. St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

6. Immunology Division, Garvan Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

7. Sinus and Nasal Specialists of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

8. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Background Rhinitis is a highly prevalent yet often misdiagnosed condition. Patients who have local allergic rhinitis are regularly mislabeled as having a nonallergic etiology. Thus, a highly accurate, reproducible, and noninvasive assessment, which can be performed quickly and with minimal discomfort to the patient, is required. Objective The aim of this research was to identify the efficiency of various nasal brushes as tools for harvest and collection of epithelial proteins and its suitability for identification of rhinitis. Methods Nasal epithelial mucosa samples were taken from patients undergoing turbinate surgery using a cytology brush, a dental brush, and a nasal curette in random order. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline, the suspended cells were sonicated. Total protein content was assessed for all samples by bicinchoninic acid assay measured using a Nanodrop machine. Identification of nasal-specific immunoglobulin E (spIgE) was then assessed using immunoassay and compared to the patient’s allergic status from epicutaneous and serum testing. The lower threshold limit for the spIgE in nasal brushings was determined using the results of serum spIgE tests as the reference. The diagnostic accuracy of this new established cutoff value was determined. Results The cytology brush was found to be the optimal tool for maximal nasal mucosa protein collection followed by dental brush and nasal curette (0.75 ± 0.45 mg/mL vs 0.43 ± 0.24 mg/mL vs 0.071 ± 0.55 mg/mL, respectively; P < .01). The optimal cutoff value of nasal spIgE from the cytology nasal brushings was 0.14 kUA/L to predict allergic status from serum testing. This gave a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 74%, likelihood ration positive of 5.40, and diagnostic odds ratio of 18.62. Conclusion The cytology brush is the optimal tool for protein collection. This is an easy and direct method to sample the nasal mucosa for assessment of nasal allergy or future biomarkers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis – 2023;International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology;2023-03-06

2. Nasal mucosal brushing as a diagnostic method for allergic rhinitis;Allergy and Asthma Proceedings;2019-05-01

3. Frontier Knowledge and Novel Therapeutic Modalities for Rhinologic Disease;American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy;2018-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3