Affiliation:
1. Kent State University, USA
Abstract
Mortality has figured prominently in the field of population geography; death, conversely, has received minimal attention. This has important implications given that mortality directs attention primarily to populations whereas death focuses attention toward individual bodies. In this progress report, I situate the geographic study of mortality within ongoing theorizations of precarity and precariousness. Drawing on Marxist ideas of labor-capacity and social reproduction, I reflect also on the idea of ‘shared mortality’. This is followed by a discussion of ‘dead peasants’ insurance. In so doing I forge a bridge between population geography and the emergent sub-field of biofinancialization. I conclude with a distinction between ‘premature death’ and ‘truncated life’.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献