Affiliation:
1. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, and University of California Berkeley, USA
Abstract
This article revisits the idea of relational comparison that grew out of my earlier research in post-apartheid South Africa in order to put it to work in new ways. First I clarify distinctively different modalities of ‘comparison’ and their political stakes, and go on to specify how the ‘relational’ in relational comparison refers to an open, non-teleological conception of dialectics at the core of Marx’s method. I then engage with sharply polarized urban studies and subaltern studies debates cast in terms of Marxism vs. postcolonialism/poststructuralism and suggest how distinctions among comparative modalities help to reconfigure the terms of the debates. The article lays the groundwork for a larger project that focuses on understanding resurgent nationalisms, populisms, and racisms in different regions of the world in relation to one another in the era of neoliberal forms of capitalism. More broadly I suggest how relational comparison, extended to include conjunctural analysis, can be used as a method for practicing Marxist postcolonial geographies.
Subject
Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
287 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Bibliography;Judicial Territory;2024-09-13
2. Notes;Judicial Territory;2024-09-13
3. List of Cases and Auxiliary Case Documents;Judicial Territory;2024-09-13
4. Selected Timeline of the Expansion of US Judicial Territory;Judicial Territory;2024-09-13
5. Conclusion;Judicial Territory;2024-09-13