Affiliation:
1. Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
In this paper, I want to suggest a framework for the study of action that does notturn ‘culture’ and ‘psychological phenomena’ into two sides ofa dichotomy, but which is sensitive to the context of action. This is called for in view of what seem to be genuinely interesting developments in our thinking about ourselves: for example,theoretical and empirical attempts to re-unite brain, body, words and world in such a way thatit is no longer interesting to speculate merely about what is ‘in’, and opposed towhat is ‘outside’, the individual. Briefly, I propose a definition of culture thatseems to offer productive empirical possibilities. After this I suggest an empirical focus on task, participant(s) and situation, by way of explicating the resources and constraints operating during action-in-context.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Psychology
Reference23 articles.
1. Baerveldt, C. & Voestermans, P. (2000). Het misverstand cultuur: Naar een psychologie van biculturaliteit . Nederlandse Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 55, 109–120 .
2. Beer, R.D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science . Trends in CognitiveScience, 4(3), 91–99 .
3. Bickle, J. (1996). New wave psychophysical reductionism and the methodological caveats . Philosophy and Phenomenology, LVI, 56–76 .
4. Where brain, body, and world collide
5. Reasons, Robots and the Extended Mind
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献