Organizational Power and Conflict regarding the Hospital—Physician Relationship: Symbolic or Substantive?

Author:

Rivers P. A.1,Woodard B.1,Munchus G.2

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Management and Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA

2. Department of Management, School of Business, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical review of organizational power and conflict regarding the hospital—physician relationship. The issue of power being symbolic and/or substantive is discussed. The classification (Mintzberg Model) of organizations as simple structures, machine bureaucracies, professional bureaucracies, divisionalized forms and adhocracies are reviewed. Also, the issue of whether the perceived autonomy that professional employees enjoy increases the likelihood that an executive level manager in a professional bureaucracy (hospital entity) will devote substantial attention to influencing symbolic outcomes as opposed to substantive outcomes in a machine bureaucracy is discussed. In conclusion, conflicts between hospitals and physicians can be resolved in two ways: (1) by avoiding controversial decisions that might threaten the powers and prerogatives of professional groups; and (2) by agreeing to decisions that hold something for everyone involved in the hospital—physician power relationship.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bibliographie;La recherche en santé;2021-12-01

2. Fiche 26. La mutation managériale post doctorat;Les docteurs conseillent les doctorants;2021-12-01

3. Assessing hospital performance indicators. What dimensions? Evidence from an umbrella review;BMC Health Services Research;2020-11-12

4. Healthcare managers’ construction of the manager role in relation to the medical profession;Journal of Health Organization and Management;2016-05-16

5. Doctors’ functional leadership in psychiatric healthcare teams – a reversible leadership logic;Team Performance Management: An International Journal;2015-06-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3