Author:
Tschannen-Moran Megan,Firestone William A.,Hoy Wayne K.,Johnson Susan Moore
Abstract
This study explored differences between a sample of highly productive scholars and a random sample of more typical scholars. Surprisingly, few demographic differences emerged; neither were large differences found in institutional responsibilities or sup -ports. Productive scholars evidenced a greater orientation toward theory and research, whereas more typical scholars were oriented toward issues in the field. Although the field has made substantial progress in attracting more women into the professorship, the small number of minority professors in educational administration remains a serious problem. Finally, five challenges are proposed that, if met, will improve the quality and use of research in educational administration.
Subject
Public Administration,Education
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A History of Leadership Thought;The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse;2022
2. A History of Leadership Thought;The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse;2022
3. A History of Leadership Thought;The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse;2022
4. Something borrowed, something blue: reflections on theory borrowing in educational administration research;Journal of Educational Administration;2020-09-09
5. The Panorama of the Last Decade’s Theoretical Groundings of Educational Leadership Research: A Concept Co-Occurrence Network Analysis;Educational Administration Quarterly;2018-02-28