Improving the detection of chronic migraine: Development and validation of Identify Chronic Migraine (ID-CM)

Author:

Lipton Richard B12,Serrano Daniel13,Buse Dawn C12,Pavlovic Jelena M12,Blumenfeld Andrew M4,Dodick David W5,Aurora Sheena K6,Becker Werner J7,Diener Hans-Christoph8,Wang Shuu-Jiun910,Vincent Maurice B11,Hindiyeh Nada A6,Starling Amaal J5,Gillard Patrick J12,Varon Sepideh F12,Reed Michael L13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, USA

2. Montefiore Headache Center, USA

3. Endpoint Outcomes, USA

4. The Neurology Center, USA

5. Department of Neurology, The Mayo Clinic, USA

6. Department of Neurology, Stanford University Medical Center, USA

7. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada

8. Department of Neurology, University of Duisbury-Essen, Germany

9. Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

10. Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taiwan

11. Department of Neurology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

12. Allergan Inc, USA

13. Vedanta Research, USA

Abstract

Background Migraine, particularly chronic migraine (CM), is underdiagnosed and undertreated worldwide. Our objective was to develop and validate a self-administered tool (ID-CM) to identify migraine and CM. Methods ID-CM was developed in four stages. (1) Expert clinicians suggested candidate items from existing instruments and experience (Delphi Panel method). (2) Candidate items were reviewed by people with CM during cognitive debriefing interviews. (3) Items were administered to a Web panel of people with severe headache to assess psychometric properties and refine ID-CM. (4) Classification accuracy was assessed using an ICHD-3β gold-standard clinician diagnosis. Results Stages 1 and 2 identified 20 items selected for psychometric validation in stage 3 ( n = 1562). The 12 psychometrically robust items from stage 3 underwent validity testing in stage 4. A scoring algorithm applied to four symptom items (moderate/severe pain intensity, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea) accurately classified most migraine cases among 111 people (sensitivity = 83.5%, specificity = 88.5%). Augmenting this algorithm with eight items assessing headache frequency, disability, medication use, and planning disruption correctly classified most CM cases (sensitivity = 80.6%, specificity = 88.6%). Discussion ID-CM is a simple yet accurate tool that correctly classifies most individuals with migraine and CM. Further testing in other settings will also be valuable.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3