Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for prevention of migraine: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled PREMIUM II trial

Author:

Najib Umer1,Smith Timothy2,Hindiyeh Nada3,Saper Joel4,Nye Barbara5,Ashina Sait6,McClure Candace K7,Marmura Michael J8,Chase Serena9ORCID,Liebler Eric10,Lipton Richard B11

Affiliation:

1. WVU Headache Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

2. StudyMetrix Research, St. Peters, MO, USA

3. Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA

4. Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

5. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

6. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

7. North American Science Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA

8. Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Neurology, Jefferson Headache Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

9. Chase Advocate Consulting, LLC, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA

10. electroCore, Inc., Rockaway, NJ, USA

11. Montefiore Headache Center, Bronx, NY, USA

Abstract

Aim Evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention. Methods After completing a 4-week diary run-in period, adults who had migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to receive active non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation or sham therapy during a 12-week double-blind period. Results Of 336 enrolled participants, 113 (active, n = 56; sham, n = 57) completed ≥70 days of the double-blind period and were ≥66% adherent with treatment, comprising the prespecified modified intention-to-treat population. The COVID-19 pandemic led to early trial termination, and the population was ∼60% smaller than the statistical target for full power. Mean reduction in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint) was 3.12 for the active group and 2.29 days for the sham group (difference, −0.83; p = 0.2329). Responder rate (i.e. the percentage of participants with a ≥50% reduction in migraine days) was greater in the active group (44.87%) than the sham group (26.81%; p = 0.0481). Prespecified subgroup analysis suggested that participants with aura responded preferentially. No serious device-related adverse events were reported. Conclusions These results suggest clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine prevention, particularly for patients who have migraine with aura, and reinforce the well-established safety and tolerability profile of this therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03716505).

Funder

electroCore, Inc.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3