Hallux Valgus Deformities: Preferred Surgical Repair Techniques and All-Cause Revision Rates

Abstract

Introduction Hallux valgus is a commonly treated condition by foot and ankle surgeons with more than 200 different described correction techniques. Recurrence rates range from 5% to 50%, with increasing support of the theory that arthrodesis procedures may have a lower recurrence rate than osteotomies. Arthrodesis procedures to the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint or tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint for correction of hallux valgus deformity are becoming more commonly utilized. The purpose of this study is to investigate the surgical incidence and revision rates of hallux valgus deformities corrected by arthrodesis compared to osteotomy in the state of South Carolina. Methods The South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office was queried from 2000 to 2017 to identify all surgically treated hallux valgus deformities. Data extraction included patient demographics, ICD-9 diagnoses, CPT procedure codes, and dates of surgery. A logistic regression model was used for statistical inference. Results A total of 22 199 feet had surgical treatment for hallux valgus during this time period, with 20 422 (92.0%), 592 (2.7%), and 1185(5.3%) receiving an osteotomy, arthrodesis, or other procedure at initial treatment, respectively. There was an all-cause revision rate of 5.6% in the osteotomy group and 6.4% in the arthrodesis group. Demographic factors such as female sex, white race, and surgery pre-2010 were associated with higher revision rates. Multiple comorbidities were correlated with higher revision rates such as tobacco use, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, recurrent dislocations, hallux rigidus, lesser toe deformities, metatarsus varus, and talipes cavus. Conclusion Despite the recent increase in arthrodesis procedures for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity, our results suggest that osteotomy procedures are more commonly performed and there is no difference in all-cause revision surgery. However, there are multiple patient demographics and comorbidities that are associated with higher rates of revision surgery and should be considered and discussed during the preoperative planning period. Level of Evidence: Level IV