Reproducibility of a Commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Bovine Paratuberculosis among Eight Laboratories

Author:

Collins Michael T.1,Angulo Arthur2,Buergelt Claus D.3,Hennager Steve G.4,Hietala Sharon K.5,Jacobson Richard H.6,Whipple Diana L.7,Whitlock Robert H.8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

2. Texas Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College Station, TX 77841

3. Department of Comparative and Experimental Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610

4. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Diagnostic Bacteriology Laboratory, Ames, IA 50010

5. California Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory System, Davis, CA 95617

6. Diagnostic Laboratory, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853

7. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames. IA 50010

8. School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA 19348

Abstract

Interlaboratory reproducibility of an absorbed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for detection of bovine serum antibodies to Mycobacterium paratuberculosis was evaluated. A panel of 30 bovine sera (15 positives and 15 negatives) was tested in triplicate microtiter wells on each of 2 days at 8 different laboratories. One laboratory had invalid results because of positive or negative serum control optical density (OD) readings beyond the acceptable range specified by the kit. The coefficient of variation (CV) for mean OD values was influenced by low ODs on test negative sera at 2 laboratories, thus the CVs on positive sera were considered a more representative measure of kit reproducibility. Between-well CVs averaged 6.7% ± 2.8% (mean ± standard deviation), and between-day CVs averaged 14.5% ± 9.8% among the 7 laboratories with valid assays on the 15 positive sera. The OD values were converted to positive or negative classifications for each assay well, and the results were compared. Among 1,392 assays in 7 laboratories, 98.6% were in agreement. Eleven of 18 discrepant results were due to a sample that consistently gave OD values near the cutoff for a positive test. Exclusion of that serum from the analysis resulted in a 99.8% rate of agreement among laboratories. Results indicated that the absorbed ELISA kit provided reproducible results within and between laboratories.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Veterinary

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3