Affiliation:
1. Western Washington University,
Abstract
Critics of the environmental movement point to its narrowness, conventionality, and sectoralism. Analysis of environmentalist discourses offers a means to assess these criticisms. Furthermore, examination of these discourses offers insight into the political ideas that link environmentalists with other progressives and those that divide these sectors. Drawing on a sample of 42 environmental activists in the United States Pacific Northwest, Q methodology is used to reconstruct 4 discourses: civic republican, liberal ecocentric, green justice, and global ecocentric. Analysis of these discourses reveals several key findings. First, issues related to racial and economic justice are the most divisive for environmentalists in the region. Second, the strongest areas of agreement across the discourses relate to the balance of nature and the importance of active, democratic citizenship. Third, the green justice discourse reflects the perspectives of activists from all sectors of the region's environmental movement, suggesting an absence of sectoralism and the existence of intramovement learning.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Environmental Science
Reference43 articles.
1. Addams, H. (2000). Q Methodology. In H. Addams & J. Proops (Eds.), Social discourse and environmental policy: An application of Q methodology (pp. 14-40). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
2. The Organizational Structure of Local Environmentalism
3. Hegemony and the Power of Constitution: Labour and Environmental Coalition-Building in Maine and Nova Scotia
4. Benford, R. (2005). The half-life of the environmental justice frame: Innovation, diffusion, and stagnation. In D. Pellow & R. Brulle (Eds.), Power, justice, and the environment: A critical appraisal of the environmental justice movement (pp. 37-53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献