Affiliation:
1. From the Division of Cardiology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
2. From the Departments of Medicine and Nuclear Medicine, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Abstract
The short-term (1 month) and long-term (6 months) safety of combination lidoflazine-propranolol therapy was investigated in an open trial of 15 patients with stable angina of effort. The possible advantages of adding lidoflazine (ti trated to 360 mg daily) to patients having a therapeutic response to propranolol (80-400 mg daily) was also evaluated. Effects on non-invasive indexes of left ventricular function (echocardiography, systolic time intervals, radionuclide ventriculography) and exercise tolerance (treadmill exercise testing) were deter mined. There was no change in mean resting heart rate with the combination therapy, although one patient developed sinus bradycardia at a rate of 44 and had to have his propranolol dose reduced. Electrocardiographic analysis showed significant prolongation of the QTc intervals on lidoflazine-propranolol therapy compared to propranolol alone, with 3 patients having QTc interval prolongation to above .53 seconds, but there was no evidence of increased ar rhythmogenesis with the combination therapy compared to propranolol alone. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index tended to rise with combination therapy. However, lidoflazine-propranolol therapy did not produce any signifi cant effects on resting ejection fraction determined by M-mode echocardio graphy or by radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide ventriculography determined peak exercise ejection fractions were also not significantly changed with combination therapy compared to propranolol alone. There were only small, insignificant improvements in exercise tolerance with the lidoflazine-pro pranolol combination treatment compared to propranolol alone. It is concluded that lidoflazine-propranolol combination therapy is generally safe but has the potential of causing serious adverse effects in certain patients, i.e. those with sick sinus disease, prolonged QTc intervals, and severe baseline left ventricular dysfunction, and that caution must be exercised in its use. Furthermore, it would appear that combination therapy provides only slight, if any, improve ments in exercise tolerance in patients with chronic stable angina having a ther apeutic response to oral propranolol.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference30 articles.
1. Clinical pharmacology of the new beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. Part 3. Comparative clinical experience and new therapeutic applications
2. Vanhoutte PM, VanNeuten JM: The pharmacology of lidoflazine. In: Myocardial Protection and Exercise Tolerance: The Role of Lidoflazine, a New Anti-anginal Agent. Royal Society of Medicine, International Congress and Symposium Series No. 29. London, Royal Society of Medicine and Academic Press, 1980, pp. 61-77.
3. Naylor WG: The protective effect of lidoflazine on ischemic and reperfused heart muscle . In: Myocardial Protection and Exercise Tolerance: The Role of Lidoflazine, a New Anti-anginal Agent. Royal Society of Medicine, International Congress and Symposium Series No. 29. London, Royal Society of Medicine and Academic Press, 1980, pp. 79-87.
4. Long-Term Evaluation of Lidoflazine in Angina Pectoris Based on Exercise Tolerance
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献