The Association of Systemic Endothelial Dysfunction With Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

Author:

Gouliopoulos Nikolaos1ORCID,Siasos Gerasimos2,Oikonomou Evangelos2ORCID,Sapounas Spyros3,Rouvas Alexandros1,Ziogas Apostolos C.4,Moschos Marilita M5,Tousoulis Dimitris6

Affiliation:

1. 2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital, Athens, Greece

2. Department of Cardiology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases General Hospital, Athens, Greece

3. Endocrine Unit and Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Alexandra’ Hospital, Athens, Greece

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece

5. 1st Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘G. Gennimatas’ General Hospital, Athens, Greece

6. Department of Cardiology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Hippokration’ General Hospital, Athens, Greece

Abstract

Our aim was to assess whether systemic endothelial dysfunction, evaluated non-invasively by flow mediated dilation (FMD), is associated with diabetic macular edema (DME) and to determine if it is further impaired in patients with diffuse-DME. Consecutive patients ( n = 84) with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diabetic retinopathy were enrolled. DME was not present in 38 (non-DME) and present in 46 patients; 25 with focal and 21 with diffuse-DME. No differences were detected between DME and non-DME groups regarding the clinical and demographic characteristics, except for the age of T2DM initiation (lower in non-DME). FMD values were significantly impaired in DME compared with non-DME patients, even after adjustment for multiple covariates (3.56 ± 1.03 vs 4.57 ± 1.25%, P = .003). Among DME patients, no differences were found concerning the clinical and demographic data, while FMD levels were significantly lower in diffuse-DME patients, compared with the focal-DME ones, regardless of the impact several confounders (2.88 ± 0.65 vs 4.08 ± 0.95%, P = .002). It is noteworthy that FMD values of non-DME and focal-DME patients did not differ significantly (4.52 ± 1.24 vs 4.21 ± 1.06%, P = .307). Moreover, among DME patients, impaired FMD was an independent predictor of diffuse-DME (odds ratio: 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.47, P = .007).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3