Disagreement in Estimates of Kidney Function for Drug Dosing in Obese Inpatients

Author:

Higdon Emily A.1,Kimmons Lauren A.2,Duhart Benjamin T.3,Hudson Joanna Q.34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA

2. Department of Pharmacy, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA

4. Department of Medicine (Nephrology), The University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, USA

Abstract

Background: The Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations are used to estimate kidney function. However, utility has been questioned in the obese population. Objective: To evaluate differences in estimates of kidney function in obese patients and implications for drug dosing. Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult inpatients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and stable kidney function. Patients were categorized based on creatinine clearance (CrCl): group 1—CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min and group 2—CrCl 15 to 59 mL/min. Mean estimates of kidney function and recommended doses of 8 renally eliminated medications were compared. Results: For the 166 patients included, mean estimates using CG, MDRD, and CKD-EPI for group 1 were 87 (23) mL/min, 91 (21) mL/min, and 96 (23) mL/min, respectively. Group 2 estimates were 42 (13) mL/min, 51 (15) mL/min, and 51 (16) mL/min, respectively. MDRD and CKD-EPI estimates were significantly higher than CG in 125 (75%) and 140 (84%) patients, respectively. Dose discrepancies were most often due to higher dose recommendations using MDRD or CKD-EPI compared to CG. Conclusion: Careful consideration of the method used to estimate kidney function, the method used for developing dosing recommendations, and the risk–benefit profile is warranted when designing drug regimens in obese individuals.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3