Comparing the Accuracy of 2 Point-of-Care Lipid Testing Devices

Author:

Bastianelli Karen1,Ledin Stacey1,Chen Jennifer2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Science, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Duluth, MN, USA

2. Division of Professional Education, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Abstract

Background: Device manufacturers have improved technology since studies were last published, thus warranting an updated analysis. Objective: Two point-of-care (POC) cholesterol testing devices were directly compared to a venous sample to determine device accuracy. Methods: Institutional review board (IRB)–approved study collected finger-stick blood samples analyzed by Cholestech LDX (Cholestech Corporation, Hayward, California) and CardioChek Plus (Polymer Technology Systems Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana) devices and compared to venous blood for 30 study participants. Statistical analyses were completed using StatisPro. Intraclass correlation coefficients were generated, and the average difference expected to be within the industry standards of total cholesterol (TC; ±10%), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (±12%), and triglycerides (TG; ±15%). Results: The POC devices produced clinically equivalent values when compared to the same patients’ samples analyzed in a reference laboratory. The average difference calculated from the actual individual paired percentage bias with the Integra analyzer: venous—TC −3.8%, HDL −6.9%, TG −1.8%; CardioChek—TC −7.8%, HDL −6.2%, TG 5.1%; and Cholestech—TC 0.5%, HDL −4.5%, TG −3.3%. The average of the actual paired percentage bias with the Roche Cobas analyzer: CardioChek—TC −4.2%, HDL 0.8%, TG 7.0% and Cholestech—TC 4.6%, HDL 2.6%, TG −1.6%. Conclusion: Both screening devices operated within industry accuracy standards.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3