Effect of a feedback system on the quality of 2-minute chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised crossover simulation study

Author:

Wu Chunshuang1,You Jingyu1,Liu Shaoyun1,Ying Lan1,Gao Yuzhi1,Li Yulin1,Lu Xiao1,Qian Anyu1,Zhang Mao1ORCID,Zhou Guangju1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine & Institute of Emergency Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

Objective We evaluated the quality of 2-minute continuous chest compressions (CCCs) performed by emergency staff in 30-second intervals to determine the effect of a feedback system on maintaining the quality of CCCs. Methods Two hundred three physicians and nurses were randomised into two groups. Each participant performed 2-minute CCCs both with and without feedback. Group A performed CCCs under the guidance of a feedback device followed by performance without feedback, and Group B performed these tasks in reverse order. The primary outcome was the proportion of optimal compressions; i.e., compressions at both the correct rate (100–120 beats/minute) and correct depth (5–6 cm). Results During 2-minute CCCs, the proportion of optimal compressions was poor in personnel without feedback. The proportion of optimal compressions was unchanged and low from 2.4% (interquartile range, 0.0%–32.8%) in the first 30 seconds to 3.3% (0.0%–47.7%) in the last 30 seconds of the 2-minute period. Use of the feedback device significantly improved and maintained the quality of compressions from the first 30 seconds (53.3%; 29.2%–70.4%) to the last 30 seconds (82.8%; 50.8%–96.2%). Conclusion Use of the feedback device was helpful for maintaining the quality of CCCs.

Funder

Zhejiang Provincial Welfare Scientific Research Project of China

Zhejiang Provincial Medical Science Foundation

2012 Chinese National Key Clinical Discipline Developing Project

2015 Welfare Scientific Research Project from the Chinese Ministry of Health

National S&T Fundamental Resources Investigation Project

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Cell Biology,Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3