Clinical practice in the management of postoperative delirium by Chinese anesthesiologists: a cross-sectional survey designed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology

Author:

Delp Simon1,Mei Wei2ORCID,Spies Claudia D.1,Neuner Bruno1,Aldecoa César3,Bettelli Gabriella4,Bilotta Federico5,Sanders Robert D.6,Kramer Sylvia1,Weiss Bjoern1

Affiliation:

1. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Berlin, Germany

2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Facultad de Medicina de Valladolid, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain

4. Department of Geriatric Surgery; Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care, Italian National Research Centres on Aging/IRCCS, Ancona, Italy

5. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome, Rome, Italy

6. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Abstract

Objective In this survey, we assessed the current clinical management of postoperative delirium (POD) among Chinese anesthesiologists, after publishing the European POD guideline. Methods We administered an electronic survey, designed according to the European POD guideline. The survey was completed using mobile devices. Results In total, 1,514 respondents from China participated in the survey. Overall, 74.4% of participants reported that delirium is very important. More than 95% of participants stated that they routinely assessed POD. In total, 61.4% screened for POD using clinical observation and 37.6% used a delirium screening tool. Although the depth of anesthesia (a POD risk factor) was monitored, electroencephalogram monitoring was unavailable to 30.6% of respondents. Regarding treatment, only 24.1% of respondents used a standard algorithm; 58.5% used individualized treatment. Conclusion Our survey showed that there are high awareness levels among Chinese anesthesiologists regarding the importance of POD. However, routine assessment and monitoring of all patients, including perioperative anesthesia depth monitoring, and a treatment algorithm need to be implemented on a larger scale. According to the results, efforts should be made to improve the knowledge of POD among Chinese anesthesiologists.

Funder

This work was supported by institutional grants and an ESA grant for the guideline development (CS, chair of the guideline task force).

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Cell Biology,Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3