Affiliation:
1. Department of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, King Abdul Aziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of the two antihistamines, astemizole and loratadine, were compared in a double-blind study of 84 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Patients were randomized to receive orally either astemizole 10 mg once daily ( n = 40) or loratadine 10 mg once daily ( n = 44) for 1 week. No other antirhinitis medication was allowed during the study. By day 7 the mean daily symptom scores, recorded on diary cards, were lower in patients receiving astemizole than in those receiving loratadine for runny nose, itchy nose and sneezing, although not for blocked nose, and treatment differences only reached statistical significance for runny nose. After 7 days, 53.75% of patients on astemizole and 38.6% on loratadine were free of symptoms, and 87% of patients on astemizole described the treatment as good or excellent compared with 62% on loratadine. The present results suggest that astemizole may be more effective than loratadine in controlling symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis.
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Cell Biology,Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference7 articles.
1. Wihl JA, Kunkel G, Middleton EJr: Perennial rhinitis. In: Allergic and Vasomotor Rhinitis: Clinical Aspects (Mygind N, Weeke B, eds). Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1985; pp 36–40.
2. Allergic Rhinitis
3. Mygind N, Naclerio RM: Allergic and Non-allergic Rhinitis: Clinical Aspects, 1st edn. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1993; pp 123–136.
Cited by
101 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献