Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting

Author:

Woerner Michael123ORCID,Voelkl Korbinian2,Bliemel Christopher4,Ferner Felix5,Weber Markus6,Renkawitz Tobias7,Grifka Joachim2,Craiovan Benjamin243

Affiliation:

1. Klinikum Bamberg, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Buger Strasse 80, Bamberg

2. Universitätsklinikum Regensburg Klinik für Orthopädie, Kaiser-Karl V-Allee 3, Bad Abbach

3. Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Klinik für Orthopädie, Kaiser-Karl V-Allee 3, Bad Abbach

4. Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Baldingertrasse, Marburg

5. Klinikum Lichtenfels, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Professor-Arneth-Straße 2b, Lichtenfels

6. Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, Regensburg

7. Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Orthopädie, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, Heidelberg

Abstract

Objective Femoral head necrosis (FHN) affects mostly young and active people. The most common operative therapy is core decompression (CD) with optional cancellous bone grafting (CBG). Because little information is available on the long-term results of these procedures, we investigated the effectiveness of CD and CD + CBG in patients with ARCO stage II FHN in terms of postoperative pain, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EuroQol 5D, and Short Form 36 Questionnaire), and disease progression. Methods We retrospectively compared 11 patients treated with CD alone 48.0 months (range, 26.3–68.5 months) postoperatively versus 11 patients treated with CD + CBG 69.2 months (range, 38.0–92.9 months) postoperatively. All patients were assessed according to a routine clinical protocol involving a clinical examination, questionnaires, and radiological imaging (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). Results The clinical and radiological results showed no significant differences between the two groups. Both interventions demonstrated equal results according to clinical scores. Conclusions Our data may encourage application of the less invasive technique of CD alone without CBG, which is more surgically demanding. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to clarify the risk factors for therapy failure.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Cell Biology,Biochemistry,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3