Outcomes Associated With Fibrin Sealant Use in Lateral Neck Dissections

Author:

Stanisce Luke1,Lai Michael2,Ahmad Nadir12,Spalla Thomas C.12,Reid Lisa M.13,Gaughan John P.4,Koshkareva Yekaterina12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA

2. Cooper Medical School, Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA

3. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA

4. Cooper Research Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

Objective To determine whether the use of fibrin sealant tissue adhesives during lateral neck dissections is associated with a change in postoperative outcomes. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Institutionally affiliated tertiary care center. Methods Various demographic, disease, and surgical data were collected for patients who underwent lateral neck dissections. Univariate regression analysis was performed with the following outcomes: total drain output and duration of drain placement, as well as incidence of postoperative infection, hematoma, seroma, chyle leak, and salivary leak. Results A total of 133 patients underwent lateral neck dissections. Fibrin sealant was used in 35% of cases (n = 46). Its use was not associated with differences in total drain output ( P = .77) or the number of days that the drains were in place ( P = .83). On secondary analysis, the use of fibrin sealant was not associated with a difference in postoperative incidence of hematoma ( P = .65), seroma ( P = .68), chyle leak ( P = .42), or salivary leak ( P = .73). These results were consistent when stratified by the presence of intraoperative complications. Its use accompanied an average cost of $674 per case. Conclusions Fibrin sealant use during lateral neck dissections was not associated with a reduction in drain output or days that the drains remained in situ. Although the current study was limited by sample size, fibrin sealant use was not associated with a decreased risk of postoperative adverse events. The evidence in this report suggests that the routine use of these products adds cost without clear benefit.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3