Affiliation:
1. Department of Geography, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract
This article examines the geopolitics and geo-economics of security and surveillance. We comparatively focus on the effects of geopolitically powerful states – China and the United States – and their influence over the use of surveillance technologies in the name of spatial security in relatively weaker states – Nepal and Afghanistan. We use these two areas of comparison to address the similarities in security logics across disparate spaces and to highlight the everyday experiences and responses to both outside influence from powerful states and national security regimes. Through interview data from our respective qualitative research in Afghanistan and Nepal, we show how the logics of security situates particular racialized and gendered bodies as suspicious and examine how individuals living in these spaces experience, understand, and challenge these security regimes. We conclude by arguing for more comparative studies of security technologies and surveillance regimes. Additionally, we view these spaces of heightened security as potential sites for increased violence, rather than security.
Funder
DDRI National Science Foundation
National Science Foundation
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Geography, Planning and Development
Reference42 articles.
1. Aikins Matthieu 2021 Times investigation: in U.S. Drone strike, evidence suggests no ISIS bomb. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/10/world/asia/us-air-strike-drone-kabul-afghanistan-isis.html. (accessed 10 September 2021).
2. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror
3. CCTV/Camera Installation and Operation Procedural, 2072 2015 Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Nepal.
4. Scale in motion? Rethinking scalar production and border externalization
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献