The influence of race on parental beliefs and concerns during an autism diagnosis: A mixed-method analysis

Author:

Azad Gazi1ORCID,Holingue Calliope23ORCID,Pfeiffer Danika23,Dillon Emily23,Reetzke Rachel3,Kalb Luke23,Menon Deepa2,Hong Ji Su23,Landa Rebecca23

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University Medical Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, USA

2. Kennedy Krieger Institute, USA

3. Johns Hopkins University, USA

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed-method study was to examine racial differences in parental beliefs and concern about autism spectrum disorder (ASD) versus clinical judgment. The sample included 489 children with ASD undergoing their first ASD evaluation. Parent belief that their child had ASD was highest among parents of White children. White children whose parents believed the child had ASD had lower ASD severity. Parents of Black/African American and Hispanic children were more likely to report communication concerns than parents of White children. Parental concern about social communication was related to higher ASD severity for Hispanic children. Implications for diagnostic processes are discussed. Lay abstract The goal of this study was to examine if there were differences between races in parental concern and belief about autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and the perspectives of clinicians. We studied 489 children with ASD who were having their first evaluation at an ASD clinic. Parents of White children most often believed that their child had ASD. However, White children whose parents believed the child had ASD were less severe in their symptoms. Parents of Black/African American or Hispanic children were more likely to have concerns about communication than parents of White children. In Hispanic families, parental concern about social communication was related to more severe symptoms in children. We discuss the implications of our findings for diagnosis.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3