Anatomically correct models for visually impaired learners: Teachers’ perspectives

Author:

Ubisi Lindokuhle1ORCID,Tsabedze Wandile1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Despite anatomically correct models (ACMs) being recommended internationally for their ability to serve as real-life, age-appropriate, and practical models in comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) for learners with visual impairment, there is still limited research exploring South African teachers’ views regarding their use. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore how South African teachers of learners with visual impairment view the use of ACMs during their CSE lessons. Method: This study used a qualitative approach and an exploratory, multiple case study research design. A total of 36 teachers from five schools for the blind were convenience sampled and data were generated via focus group discussions. The theory of planned behaviour underpinned this study, while data were analysed thematically. Results: Most teachers reacted with fear and resistance towards the use of ACMs in their teaching. Their responses were based on embarrassment, shame, and discomfort in handling the models. Part of the reason for this was that most teachers had not received prior teacher education about the use of the models. Some teachers falsely believed that ACMs were pleasure-enhancing devices. Others recommended their use only for blind learners, while yet others stated that they would use ACMs because of their practical value. Conclusion: Findings suggest that future research is needed on how best to engage the teachers of learners with visual impairment in self-awareness and desensitisation teacher training. Recommendations for a critical teaching framework, revisions to the CSE curriculum, as well as guidelines for teacher education are provided to facilitate teachers’ use of learners with visual impairment ACMs in their CSE lessons.

Funder

National Research Foundation of South Africa

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3