US college women’s understandings of definitions of intimate partner violence

Author:

Rich Rebecca1ORCID,Evans Jennifer L.2,Klimek Sally2,Wilson Lucy3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, USA

2. Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

3. Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

Abstract

Objective: Past research suggests students have differing definitions of sexual assault, violence and intimate partner violence (IPV). To adequately develop violence prevention efforts, it is important to examine how college students understand these terms and associated behaviours. The purpose of this study was to identify which behaviours are categorised as IPV by college women and whether there are any ‘grey areas’ when it comes to IPV. Design: A three-phase e-Delphi study was conducted with US college women to reach consensus on the behaviours commonly associated with IPV. Setting: The study was conducted in one large, Southeastern USA university. Method: In a first phase of work, participants answered open-ended questions about the behaviours they associated with IPV and related terms. In phase 2, participants categorised the behaviours identified in phase 1. In phase 3, consensus was reached by the 12 women who completed all three phases of work. Results: Women agreed on a list of 45 behaviours that constitute IPV as well as behaviours that fall into a ‘grey area’, with many of the latter occurring between boyfriends/girlfriends. Conclusion: Findings from the study contribute to the current knowledge base concerning IPV among US college students and their understanding of which behaviours are acceptable by intimate partners and which are not. Future research is needed with a larger more representative sample to extend the current findings. However, interim findings can be used to drive future research and may provide some insight into current student perceptions of IPV.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education,Health (social science)

Reference30 articles.

1. Delphi Panels: Research Design, Procedures, Advantages, and Challenges

2. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. (2011) The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Report, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, November.

3. The Delphi technique

4. Breiding MJ, Basile KC, Smith SG, et al. (2015) Intimate partner violence surveillance uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Report, Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3