US nationwide assessment of school health policies and practices using state-level data

Author:

Bryan Leah N12ORCID,Brener Nancy12,Barker Lawrence3,Lo Annie4,Underwood J Michael12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. School-Based Surveillance Branch, Division of Adolescent and School Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

3. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

4. Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA

Abstract

Objective: After the discontinuation of School Health Policies and Practices Study (SHPPS) in 2016, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began exploring innovative ways to gather school health information using existing surveillance systems. School Health Profiles (Profiles) is a school-based system of surveys that monitors school health policies and practices in states and other jurisdictions. The objective of this study was to assess whether prevalence estimates calculated using nationally representative SHPPS as an established benchmark were similar to estimates using aggregated Profiles data. Method: Nationwide 2014 Profiles estimates were calculated from data across all 50 US states and the District of Columbia and compared to national 2014 SHPPS estimates. Fifty-seven questions were identical between the data sources. Equivalence tests were used to determine similarity between data sources. Results: Overall, the median difference between 2014 SHPPS and 2014 Profiles estimate was one percentage point and distribution-free 95% confidence intervals were (−0.8, 3.1). Of the 57 school health policy and practice indicators examined in this study, 38 (66.7%) were found to be equivalent. Of these equivalent indicators, the median percentage point difference between data sources was 0.8 (−0.8, 2.5). A nonparametric sign test showed that none of the medians of the estimate differences examined were significantly different from zero. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the expanded utility of state-level data to meet public health surveillance needs. This study found that aggregated, state-level Profiles data can be used to calculate nationwide prevalence estimates that are reasonably consistent with results from a nationally representative survey.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3