Affiliation:
1. Royal Holloway, University of London, Uk
Abstract
Based on a re-reading of the Indian Constituent Assembly Debates in light of subsequent developments, this article provides new insights about the extent to which the Indian constitution allows affirmative action for redressing historical disadvantages and empowering marginalised communities. Since the post-colonial Indian state introduced the criterion of religion in the lists of Scheduled Castes (SCs), this sparked suspicions of efforts to prevent conversions, further augmenting India’s Hindu majority. The article re-examines such claims in light of the Indian Constituent Assembly Debates and subsequent Government Orders for notifying/modifying SCs. It argues that the list of SCs was never envisioned as religion-neutral, so that the exclusion of Pasmanda Muslims and Dalit Christians from the SCs is not a communal afterthought, while religion has all along not been the only or main criterion for affirmative action policies.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference52 articles.
1. Agha E. (2019, May 19) ‘Illegal Reservation of Lok Sabha Constituencies Leading to Low Muslim Percentage in Parliament: Report’, News18. URL (consulted 28 December 2022), from https://www.news18.com/news/india/illegal-reservation-of-lok-sabha-constituencies-leading-to-low-muslim-percentage-in-parliament-report-2146701.html
2. Social Exclusion of Muslims in India and Deficient Debates about Affirmative Action
3. Alam S. (2022) ‘Dalit Muslims and the State: Pasmanda Movement and Struggle for “Scheduled Castes Status”’, Contemporary Voice of Dalit (pp. 1–11). URL (consulted 4 February 2023), from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2455328X211069478
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献