Treatment decisions for patients with peripheral artery disease and symptoms of claudication: Development process and alpha testing of the SHOW-ME PAD decision aid

Author:

Smolderen Kim G1ORCID,Pacheco Christina23,Provance Jeremy3ORCID,Stone Nancy2,Fuss Christine2,Decker Carole23,Bunte Matthew2,Jelani Qurat-ul-ain1ORCID,Safley David M23,Secemsky Eric4ORCID,Sepucha Karen R5,Spatz Erica S6,Mena-Hurtado Carlos1,Spertus John A23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Vascular Medicine Outcomes (VAMOS) Program, Cardiovascular Medicine Section, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

2. Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA

3. School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA

4. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

5. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine Section Yale University/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA

Abstract

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) face a range of treatment options to improve survival and quality of life. An evidence-based shared decision-making tool (brochure, website, and recorded patient vignettes) for patients with new or worsening claudication symptoms was created using mixed methods and following the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria. We reviewed literature and collected qualitative input from patients ( n = 28) and clinicians ( n = 34) to identify decisional needs, barriers, outcomes, knowledge, and preferences related to claudication treatment, along with input on implementation logistics from 59 patients and 27 clinicians. A prototype decision aid was developed and tested through a survey administered to 20 patients with PAD and 23 clinicians. Patients identified invasive treatment options (endovascular or surgical revascularization), non-invasive treatments (supervised exercise therapy, claudication medications), and combinations of these as key decisions. A total of 65% of clinicians thought the brochure would be useful for medical decision-making, an additional 30% with suggested improvements. For patients, those percentages were 75% and 25%, respectively. For the website, 76.5% of clinicians and 85.7% of patients thought it would be useful; an additional 17.6% of clinicians and 14.3% of patients thought it would be useful, with improvements. Suggestions were incorporated in the final version. The first prototype was well-received among patients and clinicians. The next step is to implement the tool in a PAD specialty care setting to evaluate its impact on patient knowledge, engagement, and decisional quality. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03190382

Funder

Merck

W. L. Gore & Associates

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3