Temporal trends in pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after hip and knee replacement in older adults

Author:

Ko Darae1ORCID,Kapoor Alok2,Rose Adam J3,Hanchate Amresh D3,Miller Donald4,Winter Michael R5,Palmisano Joseph N5,Henault Lori E3,Fredman Lisa6,Walkey Allan J7,Tripodis Yorghos8,Karcz Anita9,Hylek Elaine M3

Affiliation:

1. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

2. Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

3. Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA, MA, USA

5. Data Coordinating Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

6. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

7. Section of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep, and Critical Care, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

9. Institute for Health Metrics, Cambridge, MA, USA

Abstract

Trends in prescription for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR) since the approval of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the 2012 guideline endorsement of aspirin are unknown, as are the risks of adverse events. We examined practice patterns in the prescription of prophylaxis agents and the risk of adverse events during the in-hospital period (the ‘in-hospital sample’) and 90 days following discharge (the ‘discharge sample’) among adults aged ⩾ 65 undergoing THR and TKR in community hospitals in the Institute for Health Metrics database over a 30-month period during 2011 to 2013. Eligible medications included fondaparinux, DOACs, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), other heparin products, warfarin, and aspirin. Outcomes were validated by physician review of source documents: VTE, major hemorrhage, cardiovascular events, and death. The in-hospital and the discharge samples included 10,503 and 5722 adults from 65 hospitals nationwide, respectively (mean age 73, 74 years; 61%, 63% women). Pharmacologic prophylaxis was near universal during the in-hospital period (93%) and at discharge (99%). DOAC use increased substantially and was the prophylaxis of choice for nearly a quarter (in-hospital) and a third (discharge) of the patients. Aspirin was the sole discharge prophylactic agent for 17% and 19% of patients undergoing THR and TKR, respectively. Warfarin remained the prophylaxis agent of choice for patients aged 80 years and older. The overall risk of adverse events was low, at less than 1% for both the in-hospital and discharge outcomes. The low number of adverse events precluded statistical comparison of prophylaxis regimens.

Funder

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3